When looking for experts to handle analytical tasks, it’s wise to explore other departments within your own organization. Often, there are already existing domains that work with data, such as Marketing, Finance, Sales, or Facility Management. Examine how these established domains are organized, so that your HR department can align with them now or in the future. Collaboration in this area can yield valuable synergies.
Connecting with existing structures can be rewarding but challenging. For instance, it can be difficult to secure time and capacity from professionals who are often already fully occupied. Therefore, it may be a choice to organize the governance of HR Analytics separately to generate more speed in the short term. The downside is that it may lead to ‘reinventing the wheel’.
A great option is a middle ground, where the HR department sets up its own data governance in a decentralized manner, within centrally established frameworks that apply to all domains. Think of frameworks such as which technology is used (Azure, SAP, Amazon, etc.), how data is collected, processed, and stored, and so on.
This way, each domain can develop and undertake at its own pace on topics that are opportune for them, while retaining the possibility to centralize data initiatives across different domains. This prevents more mature domains having to stand still due to domains starting with data, such as HR. Or, on the contrary, that HR remains underexposed because continuous priority is given, for example, to Finance & Sales.
Before determining which roles to fill through insourcing and which through outsourcing, we list the various roles within the HR data domain.
The image below explains the coherence and collaboration between the different roles.
Insourcing is when a company chooses to perform certain tasks or activities internally, within the organization. Outsourcing is when a company chooses to delegate certain tasks or activities to external parties. Both solutions have advantages and disadvantages.
Insourcing
Regardless of whether a decentralized or centralized data governance is chosen, insourcing these HR data analytics roles has several pros and cons:
Pros:
Cons:
Outsourcing
Outsourcing has different pros and cons:
Pros:
Cons:
We have listed the pros and cons and now need to make the decision: are we going to outsource or insource? HR wants to demonstrate the added value of a data-driven approach quickly. Therefore, it is essential to achieve results promptly. This can be a reason to initially fill multiple roles, especially the most strategic role (Translator), externally. The purpose of this person is to identify opportunities in the short term based on input provided by, among others, the HR management team, HR colleagues, or the organization. The knowledge this person brings can expedite this process.
The Translator brings HR context, which needs to be conveyed to the Data Science team. These roles can be quite generic and, depending on the organization’s (future) needs, can be filled internally or externally. The aforementioned pros and cons must be considered in this decision.
An exception is the role of Employee Experience Specialist. Unless there is someone within the company with a lot of experience in this field, it is preferable to hire an expert for this role. Asking critical questions that can lead to actionable insights is indeed a specialized skill.
Partner